I win for the good guys in CT. Rare, indeed!
1 posted on
04/20/2014 12:20:59 PM PDT by
raybbr
To: raybbr
Didn’t the fascist constitution shredding state of CT. just demand all gun owners turn in their guns or be charged with a felony? So they are not going to arrest the victim in this case being that’s what liberals usually do when someone harms their criminal heroes?
To: raybbr
Yup.
I’m surprised they didn’t charge the guy
3 posted on
04/20/2014 12:38:03 PM PDT by
RandallFlagg
(Uninstall Fascist Firefox. Get Pale Moon.)
To: raybbr
Wait until the DA learns of the excessive discretion of the PD.
Allowing a citizen to defend himself, rather than being a passive statistic.
4 posted on
04/20/2014 12:41:36 PM PDT by
G Larry
(There's the Beef!)
To: raybbr
Well. Personal rights wins this round!
5 posted on
04/20/2014 1:12:49 PM PDT by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
To: raybbr
At least he wasn’t shooting at squirrels. I don’t think a pistol is an assault weapon in CT.....yet. I hope they were illegals and get deported.
6 posted on
04/20/2014 2:02:37 PM PDT by
bjorn14
(Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
To: raybbr
The man, a National Guard staff sergeant who requested his name not be used to protect him and his family No kidding. I'm surprised they didn't shoot him, his family, and his dogs already, and burn down his house for shooting at the criminal element. Can't have citizens who can protect themselves.
To: raybbr
He is safer in Afghanistan than in Hartford.
8 posted on
04/20/2014 6:36:58 PM PDT by
ExCTCitizen
(I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson