Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

From the ruling:

“Upholding a lower-court ruling, the Virginia Supreme Court said releasing the emails would have put UVA “at a competitive disadvantage in relation to private universities and colleges.”

What is there not to understand?

By all your logic, anybody who has endowed a public university should have access to internal communications. Had Mr. Mann broke the law or conspired to break the law, yes I can see the DA or the US attorney having priviledge and access to the email.

By no means was Mr. Mann an employee of the the Government. He was a (visiting) professor as the government merely appoints the regents and provides endowments and approves the charter.

My assertion stands. Good decision. Correct decision.


49 posted on 04/19/2014 8:26:37 PM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Usagi_yo

“By all your logic, anybody who has endowed a public university should have access to internal communications.”

By my logic, anyone who works at a public university should have as much transparency to his emails as I had when working for the military. I think anyone who thinks their emails are private and undiscoverable is an idiot, because anyone can forward your email to anyone. Do you really believe my email as a private citizen is not open to discovery, if it might apply to a legal case?

My assertion stands. Bad decision.


50 posted on 04/19/2014 9:34:29 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I sooooo miss America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson