“The cattle grazing rights were fraudulently extinguished in the 90s. He was not supposed to be grazing, hence no fees.”
So if the grazing rights were FRAUDULENTLY extinguished wouldn’t that mean they are still in effect?
“He was not supposed to be grazing...but he was? So then he has to pay fees, because the grazing rights were FRAUDULENTLY extinguished?
This is confusing. Do you have a source for these rights even being fraudulently extinguished? I’m going to look for it but if you know...
but’ FRAUDULENTLY extinguished, suggests they are still in effect?
https://www.hcn.org/issues/44.16/one-sagebrush-rebellion-flickers-out-or-does-it
Depends on who you talk to and on just who's mouth the Law comes from these days.
BLM Seeks Public Interest for Solar Energy Development in the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone
WASHINGTON, D.C. Washington, D.C. - The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) today announced that it is accepting preliminary right-of-way (ROW) applications and expressions of interest from interested parties for conducting a solar competitive auction on the 5,717acre Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone in Clark County, Nevada.