Posted on 04/17/2014 4:37:40 AM PDT by TurboZamboni
And not her private email messages if conveying government information that should have been communicated via the government-appointed email system.
....flushed into prison, along with ANY manager, supervisor, etc., who participated in the illegal act. Additionally, any IRS employee currently indicted for tax evasion, fraud, delinquent, etc., should be immediately terminated and prosecuted.
Private e-mails, yes. Emails from her office, or as part of her public job? No.
Add in also that the inquiries were about applications that had *already* been segregated by politics.
Some of the government e-mail solutions are custom written...the Clinton White House email system was notoriously so. As such, they have archiving functions that don’t allow unarchiving in a competent manner. I suspect that it is at least partially on purpose...or at least opportunisticly unfixed.
Does she have a EPA “Richard Windsor” type alias?
Thanks for the link Mike. I had not seen that.
As much as I hate Lerner, I also do not want the Constitution violated in going after her.
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.” - 4th Amendment.
********************************
I have to disagree with you ,,, she is MY EMPLOYEE and she is using MY COMPUTERS ,, those are MY E:MAILS ... we don’t need no stinking warrant ,, my agent in congress who is charged with oversight has all the authority needed to seize the files.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.