Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Fossil

That would explain why the BLM backed down. Confiscating the herd for subsequent auction might be within the rulings of the courts. On the other hand, killing the herd would be seen as pure spite on behalf of the the Feds. They couldn’t allow that to hit the 10 o’clock news coverage, because everyone would see it for what it was: bullying.


4 posted on 04/16/2014 5:15:23 PM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: the_Watchman
Which is what I have said.

Talking with a lawyer friend of mine who has dealt with BLM issues before, Bundy doesn't have much of a legal case. However if they killed the cattle (which I suspect was the point of this little game), now he has a HUGE case.

In short, they can take you cattle to auction to pay for back fees, but they can't just kill them.

8 posted on 04/16/2014 5:18:08 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: the_Watchman
everyone would see

Not everyone can "see": most can't.

10 posted on 04/16/2014 5:26:52 PM PDT by Theodore R. (It was inevitable: Texans will always be for Cornball and George P.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: the_Watchman

“...killing the herd would be seen as pure spite on behalf of the the Feds.”

Hey - if it’s good enough for FDR, it’s good enough for Obama.


30 posted on 04/16/2014 5:52:29 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts 2013 is 1933 REBORN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson