Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jacquerie
Article V was written to provide the states with the authority to remedy federal overreach.

I want to collect and preserve the answers to these questions:
"... They already ignore the existing Constitution! ...'"
"... What good would adding more amendments do? ..."
"... Why bother? ... "
17 posted on 04/16/2014 3:27:59 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Repeal The 17th
An Article V Convention of States

For those who say:
"... this is dangerous ..."
"... this is a terrible idea ..."
"... liberal States might send extremists as delegates ..."
"... other important things might be changed ..."
"... they will attack the Bill of Rights ..."
"... the right to free speech or right to bear arms could be taken away ..."
"... they might try to re-write the entire Constitution ..."
-
An Article V Convention of States has no authority to re-write or even to amend the Constitution.
-
An Article V Convention of States is simply a formal gathering of delegates from
at least 34 states (two-thirds), to discuss, debate, and "propose amendments" to the Constitution.
-
The State resolutions currently circulating call for an Article V Convention of States using the same language.
"...for the purpose of proposing amendments to the Constitution which:
- Impose fiscal restraints on the Federal Government;
- Limit the power and jurisdiction of the Federal Government; and
- Limit the terms of office for federal officials and members of Congress."
-
When/if the two-thirds threshold is met, each State would send delegates to gather in the convention.
The delegates would be selected by the various State legislatures.
The delegates would discuss, debate, and "propose amendments" to the Constitution.
The convention would operate on a one State = one vote system; with each State carrying the same weight.
-
Any proposal not within the stated purpose of the Convention of States
(fiscal restraints; limits on power and jurisdiction; limits on terms of office)
would be unauthorized, rejected, and not approved by the Convention of States.
-
Any proposal that emerged as a "proposed amendment" by the Convention of States
would require ratification by 38 states (three-fourths), the same as with any other proposed amendment.
-
An Article V Convention of States has no authority to re-write or even to amend the Constitution.
-
Read more at: http://www.conventionofstates.com
-

21 posted on 04/16/2014 3:33:26 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Repeal The 17th

The thrust of the CoS is to restore the powere of the states sufficiently to allow them to reign the power of the federal government. If the federal government refuses to follow the duly ratified amendments then we can be their slaves or we can fight. I would rather try the peaceful path. There is always time for the other option. To a point...


35 posted on 04/16/2014 6:44:13 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Repeal The 17th
"... What good would adding more amendments do? ..."

In some cases it could make their current untouchable status quite touchable.
Remember the John Murtha incident, where judges declared that he was a federal employee so that they could protect him from the slander lawsuits by the marines?

40 posted on 04/16/2014 8:56:31 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson