I do not claim to be a Cliven Bundy expert. What I wrote was based, in part, upon some of his filings in federal court that I could get access to. Interestingly, there was no “sovereign citizen” defense in what I read, merely the articulation of some of the arguments I recited. I should say I call them “well-founded” in the sense of being based on the original and true conception of the Constitution, rather than being “well-founded” in light of modern federal case law.
With that, I agree.