U.S. v. Gardner discusses the same claims Bundy raises and disposes each of them in a rational decision well-founded in the law and facts. This is most definitely not a case of judge-made law.
That’s the one.
The 9th Circus failed to even nod at Art 1 Sec 8 sub 7 & 17 that clearly states what the FedGov may retain ownership of. Instead, they rely on an overboard interpretation of the general Territory disposition to allow for an expansion of Federal power.
It’s a perfect example of “judge made law”.