If the east becomes an independent country, it would definitely join the Russia led Customs Union.
People are alienated by Kiev’s bungling and mismanagement. You have in Kiev dominated by Western Ukrainians that have done as much as possible to make Moscow’s case it doesn’t represent the country. Which is also stupid.
Ask me again how killing fellow Ukrainians will keep the country together? It won’t. The disintegrative processes have now taken on a life of their own. They cannot be reversed through the use of force.
No one outside of Lvov supports the Maidan regime.
I'm in Wyoming and I support the Ukrainian right to be free of filthy, smelly, uncultured, drunken Russian hooligans who abuse themselves to fantasies of raping their way across Europe like their grandfathers before them.
And only a выродок supports a выродок.
Perhaps you should make yourself aware of the risks, past and future, associated with incitement to aggression with respect to the ongoing Russian aggression against the territorial integrity and independence of the Ukraine.
From Nuremberg to The Hague: Towards an International Crime of Incitement to Aggression
Michael G. Kearney
in The Prohibition of Propaganda for War in International Law
Published in print November 2007 | ISBN: 9780199232451
Published online January 2009 | e-ISBN: 9780191716034 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232451.003.0006
The Prohibition of Propaganda for War in International Law
Michael G. Kearney
ISBN: 9780199232451
E-ISBN: 9780191716034
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232451.001.0001
See details in Oxford Index
Available in
Oxford Scholarship Online » abstract
Buy this work at
Oxford University Press »
More Options
Find a librarySelect a Library...
Anacortes HS Art Institute of Toronto Art Institute of Vancouver - Burnaby British Columbia Institute of Technology Burnaby Public Library See more or search...
More Like ThisShow all results sharing this subject:
public international law
GO
Feedback »Preview
This chapter makes the case for the inclusion in the Rome Statute of a distinct and inchoate crime of ‘direct and public incitement to aggression’. A similar offence was included in the International Law Commission’s draft Code of Offences Against the Peace and Security of Mankind in 1954 yet omitted from the 1996 draft, a move which is herein considered. The jurisprudence of the ad hoc international criminal tribunals provide guidance on the criminalization of incitement to crimes of an international dimension, especially cases dealing with charges of hate speech, war propaganda, and...
This chapter makes the case for the inclusion in the Rome Statute of a distinct and inchoate crime of ‘direct and public incitement to aggression’. A similar offence was included in the International Law Commission’s draft Code of Offences Against the Peace and Security of Mankind in 1954 yet omitted from the 1996 draft, a move which is herein considered. The jurisprudence of the ad hoc international criminal tribunals provide guidance on the criminalization of incitement to crimes of an international dimension, especially cases dealing with charges of hate speech, war propaganda, and incitement to genocide, war crimes, or crimes against humanity. The Rome Statute itself, and its drafting, is also discussed, particularly with regards the crime of aggression.
Show MoreShow Less
Keywords: Rome statute; International Law Commission; incitement; aggression; Rwanda; Nahimana; inchoate; Yugoslavia; Nuremberg; genocide
Chapter. 26781 words.
Subjects: public international law
http://oxfordindex.oup.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232451.003.0006
Right, that’s why in Mykolayiv and in Zaporizhya (both in south Ukraine) they were kicked out. I wonder if Russia Today carried that, but I’ll be glad to give you links