This is the appropriate way to highlight this important issue. Bundy, by virtue of his non-payment of fees and decades of disobedience of court orders, is not an a good poster-boy for this cause.
Bundy not paying ‘fees’ to an agency that wants to put him out of business is perfectly fine. It’s no different than the Connecticut gun owners who refuse to pay a fee so their state government can confiscate their guns.
Yeah, well, I guess our boys in Boston circa 1773 were not necessarily good poster boys at the time either.
He paid his fees to the state, who owned the land. Not to the feds.
I’d say he represents a lot of whats right with America.
If we continue being good little followers down the path to socialism we will continue to reap the same rewards.
Do you get paid by the hour to troll these threads?
It’s just a tax on tea and stamps. These British Colonists are not good poster boys for The Empire.
“Bundy, by virtue of his non-payment of fees and decades of disobedience of court orders, is not an a good poster-boy for this cause.”
You need to go read a post by “pony girl.” The non-payment of “grazing fees” is a virtually non-issue here in the larger context of what the BLM is trying to accomplish by force.
This is the appropriate way to highlight this important issue. Bundy, by virtue of his non-payment of fees and decades of disobedience of court orders, is not an a good poster-boy for this cause.Agreed completely. I'm glad to see Jim support this type of state legislation.