6 constants - maybe you should google it for yourself - ehh?
How many constants do you think there are? Have you not considered that the radio-isotope decays rates all differ depending upon which father/daughter elements are used? Does that still qualify them as constants even when they differ from each other and carbon dating too?
Are you unaware of recent scientific disclosures of carbon-14 found in artifacts and fossils claimed to be millions of years old yet the presence of carbon-14 completely contradicts those ages too?
Growing weary and leary of answering questions w/o any responses in kind to my queries as well as statements I think you long age folks have not pondered before.
Majority opinion does not mean anything has to be right. The greatest scientific findings often go against the herd mentality and cause major paradigm shifts. just sayin...
I did. there are lots of links and references, and many more than 6.
I'm not going to play this game with you.
If you say there are only 6, you should be able to name them, and explain why those are constant and none of the other of the myriad of things described as "physical contants" in various reference books aren't really constant.
Have you not considered that the radio-isotope decays rates all differ depending upon which father/daughter elements are used?
Yes. And I've considered that the masses of the atoms of different elements are all different. It never occurred to me to try to twist that into an argument that it means that the masses of atoms of the same element can't be constant.