Someone needs to explain why a Dem beating Bhoner is a bad thing. His loss will be offset by a gain elsewhere and we have a ‘figurative...since they don’t use it) anyway.
He wants amnesty, the Dem wants Amnesty. He has stopped meaningful investigation into the multiple scandals, so will the dem. He is caving on gay and social issues daily, the Dem is already there. He keeps funding Obamacare, so will the Dem.
So unless someone gives an explanation around here as to why a Dem win of Bhoner’s seat is WORSE than leaving him there considering the FACTS above, it looks to me like a few pwople on this thread WANT the RINO control to continue.
If it takes a Dem to get this jackass out of government, so be it. Call it a ‘lesser evil’ ;)
EDIT
” ‘figurative...(since they don’t use it) anyway), majority.
I agree
The majority party owns the speakership. The speaker has immense power as far as what goes up for a vote. Getting rid of Boehner as speaker would be a good thing except if it meant giving the seat up to the Democrats. I just can’t understand why some people think it is better to have a Dem that a moderate Repub. I would eat steak every day if I could afford the calories and fat, but I can’t, so I don’t. That doesn’t mean I’m going to just give away all my food. Some days it’s just beans and cornbread.