Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chaosagent
"Actually, No."

Actually, yes. The whole space shuttle design that was implemented was a kludge forced on NASA by budget cuts.

The original shuttle concept had both stages recoverable and reusable. No disposable "solid rocket boosters" in that original design at all. All well-behaved, well-known liquid fuel rocket engines.

The Challenger astronauts went to their deaths PRECISELY because of budget cuts.

50 posted on 04/12/2014 11:54:23 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (Newly fledged NRA Life Member (after many years as an "annual renewal" sort))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog

And actually NO.

No one was talking about the ‘Flyback Booster’ concept.

Otherwise we could talk about the design change that led to the tiles. Or we could talk about the ET insulation change that brought Columbia down.

But we’re talking about accident as it happened.

And that was Sheer Bad Luck.

And I was there.


51 posted on 04/12/2014 12:12:12 PM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson