And in the alternative reality you wish to inhabit -- the one in which that agency bio is the only thing considered or discussed -- I guess I do lose.
But in the real universe I and most other thinking people inhabit there is this inconvenient (for your argument, that is) thing called "other and more probative evidence." And when that is brought to bear on the question and the larger context of the discussion is entertained, then your argument collapses. But you've been doing your best to play the "if I don't acknowledge it, then it doesn't exist" game. You are quite skilled in that game.
The author bio is what I was originally discussing on this thread. I broached the topic. You Obama-defenders are the ones who keep trying to change it.
I do believe the author bio is dispositive. Acton & Dystel wouldn’t have used it as a prime marketing/selling hook w’out Obama’s knowledge & approval. There are alternate explanations for many of the contradictions in Obama’s shady history. But this bio from his own agents is unique. It represents a point in time when Obama accepted big bucks for writing a born-in-Kenya bio. He wasn’t dabbling in fraud. For once in his life he was dabbling in the truth.