Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CpnHook

No, it’s not that simple. His agency published the facts of his bio in direct conjunction w the promised first book. You don’t get to redact just the fact you find inconvenient. It was posited as a crucial element of Obama’s life story. Sorry if you don’t like it. It’s there, in Black and White.


109 posted on 04/15/2014 12:22:08 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: Fantasywriter
His agency published the facts of his bio in direct conjunction w the promised first book.

And the agency has stated on that point it made a mistake. And we don't just have to take the agency's word for it. We can compare the Times, Post and Tribune articles from 1990. We can compare the school application Obama's parents made in 1968 stating he was born in Hawaii. We can compare the INS files on BHO, Sr. which indicate he had a son born in Hawaii. We can look to the birth announcements. We can look to the repeated statements by the State of Hawaii.

The agency made a mistake.

110 posted on 04/15/2014 12:31:45 PM PDT by CpnHook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson