Posted on 04/11/2014 4:06:05 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
At a restaurant just off the San Jose State University campus Thursday evening, a young waitress, exasperated by the sudden crush of customers ordering salads and a white wine, paused from her exertions to explain why she was so slammed.
"They're all going to see Hillary Clinton," she said, sizing up the room.. "Everywhere you look, it's the same demographic."
A mostly middle-aged, conspicuously Caucasian crowd of women filled the university's Event Center for Clinton's appearance as part of Unique Lives & Experiences.
That was the demographic that was clearly top of mind for the former first lady, senator and secretary of state.
Looking by turns confident in her message and comfortable in her own skin, Clinton sounded like someone ready for her next campaign.
(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...
Why did Hitlery cancel her appearance in San Diego this month?
Local news reporters in California are more biased than the national news/propaganda outlets are. I don’t know about the rest of the country.
Yeah, she’s dazzling alright, -like a pair of old warn out shoes.
Hillary Clinton cancelled her San Diego appearance because Sean Smith’s mother (killed in Bengazi) was going to get in her face.
WTH,those women are easily amused.
Interesting historical fact: if elected, Hillary Clinton would be the first president with facial hair since William Howard Taft.
I guess Dems love a murderer as long as the killer is a Dem
I know. :)
“Hillary Clinton dazzles crowd at San Jose State”
That’s like saying Hitler mesmerized the crowds in Berlin. The brainless, 50 IQ apes at San Jose will not elect the slut Hillary president.
Did she take off her clothes?
Oh, that was "dazzles," not frazzled.
5.56mm
LOL! Yes I think ROmney was better looking but the females in my family said he looked too old, and one said he looked like a phony, like a comic book character from Fantastic 4 with the gray sideburns. Either way, it’s pretty pathetic how looks are given such importance in an election. Like they say: If Lincoln ran today never in a million years would he be elected. Matter of fact if Lincoln ran today against Justin Beiber - if Justin was old enough, Justin Beiber would win by a landslide no matter how bad he did in the debates. He could stutter through the entire debates and still win which is exactly what happened with Obama. He was a mess during those debates yet he still won. The bottom line is we keep getting these absolute morons elected into office because women keep insisting on voting over looks. My own mother tells me this every election. “Mom who are you voting for?” “Oh I am voting for Bill Clinton/Obama because he is good looking” Those are her EXACT words! My Aunt voted for Obama TWICE after I told her a million times not to, but she did anyway. NOW she tells me she regrets it. Ding dong! It’s like they can’t help it or something.
(wishful thinking) No she won't. No, Not ever.
Nobody had a brick to throw?
These moronic dems seem to have forgotten that Vince Foster was a dem.
Hitlary musters the dried up vagina crowd...
cheap f-ers order salad and a wine... and no tip...
Libtards are an emotional brain dead crowd.
the Specops boys will make the swifting of kerry look like a girls scout outing.... benghazi isn’t going away...
so lets see- the citizens of uber left wing San Jose are excited about seeing uber left wing hillary clinton???11 wow- now there’s a shock...
She will not get the black turnout that Obama did. She will get some women who may not have voted, but she will not get conservative women voting for a woman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.