Who knows what you are arguing about, you seem to just want to argue no matter how much you have to keep moving and changing the subject.
Post 17 was accurate and a reasonable post, but man has it set you off on a wide ranging search for some kind of argument, from Vietnam to female casualties.
To: exDemMom
“”I think that, psychologically, women are just as capable of handling combat as men. After all, women already work in areas that bring them very close to combat; in the capacity of doctors and nurses, they routinely deal with combat-caused injuries and psychological problems.””
Working in a hospital, is hardly combat, they don’t have anything in common at all.
17 posted on 4/11/2014 11:14:08 AM by ansel12
I really don’t know what your issue is, or why you keep trying to read things I did not say into my posts.
You clearly do not know anything about the operating environment in today’s combat zones, or about the stressers that exist throughout those zones.
You also obviously want to argue about something. I saw you doing the same thing in another thread, where at least two people were calling you out on it.
No offense, but perhaps you should go get a full physical evaluation and find out what is going on there.