Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
Working in a hospital, is hardly combat, they don't have anything in common at all.

Now you reveal that you were pushing a political agenda when you started with your sill claim.

I fail to understand how a simple statement of fact constitutes "pushing a political agenda." The fact is that 143 women have died on deployment during the war on terror in Afghanistan and Iraq, many of them as a direct consequence of enemy action. Women *do* work in combat zones and have always been present in and near combat zones.

As I said before, there is no reason to think that women are less able than men to withstand the psychological pressures of combat. However, we tend to be small and not very muscular; we would have difficulty with the physical aspects of combat roles.

36 posted on 04/12/2014 11:04:10 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom

How you switched from our discussion on your silly hospital claim to suddenly now about female military personnel in combat in Afghanistan and Iraq, is interesting to see.

If you wanted to push liberal politics about females in the military, why didn’t you just say so?

If you don’t then why change the subject?


37 posted on 04/12/2014 11:17:23 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson