That’s not a comparable scenario. Bundy doesn’t own the land, he rents it. Well, he did, but he stopped paying rent in 1993.
I don’t doubt that there is an ulterior motive and I don’t doubt that there are corrupt politicians involved. The fact remains that Bundy doesn’t have a legal right to graze his cattle on the land anymore.
Does that necessitate an armed invasion to remove Bundy’s cattle? No.
You happen to think the Feds have the right to own this property. I happen to believe you're wrong.
I happen to think Cliven Bundy is merely the last man standing in a battle which has gone on for over 20 years and you choose to side with the Feds. Good luck to you with that. This corruption will continue and they will move the goal posts and change the rules as they see fit to accomplish their goal of total servitude of the people. Remember whose side you were on when they get around to you.
Bundy did NOT stop paying it. The BLM refused to honor his payments. He then offered the State of Nevada to hold the funds for the Feds, but the State refused.
You are an uninformed fool and a mouthpiece for corruption. What the HELL are you doing on FreeRepublic spreading these falsehoods?