The article isn’t all that clear, but if being an “isolationist” today means staying clear of Syria and stating the obvious about the rest of the Middle East - that we had NO BUSINESS in toppling regimes and we’ve managed to take an area where we had dictators that we could live with, and replace them with horrendous who-knows-what, except that they hate America and kill Christians for sport. And if being an “isolationist” means thinking that it’s a bad idea to go toe-to-toe with either Russia or China, after decimating our military, then call me an “isolationist”.
Not sure about the other stuff though.
The article isn’t all that clear, but if being an “isolationist” today means staying clear of Syria and stating the obvious about the rest of the Middle East - that we had NO BUSINESS in toppling regimes and we’ve managed to take an area where we had dictators that we could live with, and replace them with horrendous who-knows-what, except that they hate America and kill Christians for sport. And if being an “isolationist” means thinking that it’s a bad idea to go toe-to-toe with either Russia or China, after decimating our military, then call me an “isolationist”.I'm definitely with you.