Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

The “fee” for federal grazing rights never reflects the economic value of the land. The government has no more business picking the winners and losers in the cattle business than it does in any other industry.


9 posted on 04/08/2014 4:24:53 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Lucky

The losers and winners were already picked when people acquired deed to water access land. Without it, no access to water, all the grazing land on the planet doesn’t mean squat. For extra credit, look up how much of Nevada is Federal Land. I think you will be surprised.


13 posted on 04/08/2014 4:32:51 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Lucky

The government doesn’t pick winners and losers. It sells stuff to buyers willing to pay. And yes, it DOES reflect the value of the land, since it competes with private land.


19 posted on 04/08/2014 4:39:06 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I sooooo miss America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Lucky
Anybody want to guess how much it costs to graze a single head of cattle on publicly administered land? $1.35 per month for one cow and its calf, if applicable.

The obvious downsides are you have to bring in the cattle well before slaughter to switch them to a different feed. The other downside is that you have losses of cattle. Plenty of cow carcasses littering the landscape in Nevada.

44 posted on 04/08/2014 6:41:17 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson