Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TurboZamboni
Several crucial differences emerged between families that had access to a car and those that did not. The families with cars moved to neighborhoods with less poverty and were more likely to stay there. They lived in neighborhoods with less unemployment, higher median rents, more access to green space and lower levels of cancer risk. By the end of the government's survey, these families also lived in neighborhoods with better-performing schools.

They are describing suburbia - lefties hate suburbia. Unless, as it seems, they believe that the populations should be switched.

7 posted on 04/08/2014 4:59:39 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (Historians will refer to this administration as "The Half-Black Plague.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Aevery_Freeman
They are describing suburbia - lefties hate suburbia. Unless, as it seems, they believe that the populations should be switched.

The lefties really DO hate those safe, clean, well-armed, Republican, low tax suburban and rural areas!

The population switch experiment has already been demonstrated by the French.

In France, the cities may be the preferred choice for the wealthy live and the suburbs are where the poor and minorities tend to live.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/23/french-intifada-arab-banlieues-fighting-french-state-extract

"Poor" households in the US have more cars than middle-class households almost everywhere on the planet. Poverty in the United States in 2014 doesn't have much (if anything) to do with money.

17 posted on 04/08/2014 5:28:23 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson