Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BitWielder1

This inversion of the laws concerning the conservation of energy puzzled me as well.

Simply unlocking CO2 and hydrogen from seawater is highly energy-intensive, and it has to come from SOMEWHERE. CO2 and hydrogen CAN be turned into fuel, through something called the Fischer-Tropsch process, but to proceed on an efficient basis, it requires a relatively high temperature to assure the carbon dioxide transforms into carbon monoxide, then the reaction can continue in the direction of forming hydrocarbon fuels.

The chemistry has been widely studied for 80-some years, and was put to use by the Third Reich in its dying days, to supply fuel for the Wehrmacht, after they had been denied access to oil fields in Romania and elsewhere. But the Germans still had a lot of coal, which was their base resource, and the process of making “syngas” had been well established many years before.

THERE IS NO COAL FLOATING AROUND IN THE OCEAN, but there may be a lot of organic matter there, which would be the source of the carbon necessary to make the carbon monoxide feedstock. Water, of course, is composed of hydrogen and oxygen, but it still takes considerable power to unlock that source.


46 posted on 04/07/2014 11:08:10 AM PDT by alloysteel (Selective and willful ignorance spells doom, to both victim and perpetrator - mostly the perp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: alloysteel
That's a thought. Scooping up any organic matter and converting it to fuel may be a better bet than CO2 + H2O + Lots Of Energy = Fuel + O2.

47 posted on 04/07/2014 11:12:33 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson