To: markomalley
Key point: The denial leaves standing a decision by the state's highest court that went against the photo studio
6 posted on
04/07/2014 6:59:34 AM PDT by
madprof98
To: madprof98
So basically if they ask the photographer to take a close up of the inside of their poopy butt hole, they’ll have to do it.
8 posted on
04/07/2014 7:01:57 AM PDT by
MNDude
To: madprof98
Yeah, of course. They should all be impeached. We need term limits on the federal benches too. All of them. Not just the supremes.
19 posted on
04/07/2014 7:16:36 AM PDT by
b4its2late
(A Progressive is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
To: madprof98
I wonder what the result would be if an anti-gun photographer was asked to take photos of live fire at a gun range? Would those same courts/judges find that he/she had no right to refuse?
26 posted on
04/07/2014 7:30:49 AM PDT by
logic101.net
(How many more children must die on the altar of gun control?)
To: madprof98
I’m disappointed it took six posts to make that point. I’m also disappointed in SCOTUS, but I’m used to that.
27 posted on
04/07/2014 7:31:28 AM PDT by
Cyber Liberty
(H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
To: madprof98
By inaction the SC supported the case.
34 posted on
04/07/2014 8:11:32 AM PDT by
MaxMax
(Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
To: madprof98
Is this foretelling of the obamacare contraceptive/religious freedom case just heard? Worries me.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson