They only needed four justices to review the case. Guess Roberts didn’t want to have a review.
I can’t get the article to open on my phone. Did SCOTUS flat out refuse to hear it, or rather decide not to hear it *now* based on a technical (like standing, or expedited review) point?
The Court is highly protective of itself when it comes to technical procedures. Refusing to hear the case may not mean that it’s all settled ...
There was no recorded dissent from the denial, so it appears that none of the justices wanted to hear this case.