Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

They only needed four justices to review the case. Guess Roberts didn’t want to have a review.


35 posted on 04/07/2014 8:13:52 AM PDT by Girlene (Hey, NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Girlene

I can’t get the article to open on my phone. Did SCOTUS flat out refuse to hear it, or rather decide not to hear it *now* based on a technical (like standing, or expedited review) point?

The Court is highly protective of itself when it comes to technical procedures. Refusing to hear the case may not mean that it’s all settled ...


40 posted on 04/07/2014 8:31:25 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Girlene
They only needed four justices to review the case. Guess Roberts didn’t want to have a review.

There was no recorded dissent from the denial, so it appears that none of the justices wanted to hear this case.

85 posted on 04/07/2014 11:11:27 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson