Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enlightened1

From the article, I did not get the impression that he was grazing on his own land. Rather, that he was grazing on federal land and not paying the fees.


5 posted on 04/07/2014 6:47:38 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: taxcontrol

In the video there a clearly cattle feeding in bottom land. The is most likely his. In Nevada most bottom land is owned by private parties.


7 posted on 04/07/2014 6:51:49 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol

“Rather, that he was grazing on federal land and not paying the fees.”

No, in 1993 the BLM closed the land to grazing in order to protect the habitat. Prior to 1993 ranchers could pay fees in exchange for grazing rights. This rancher just kept running his cattle on the land.


10 posted on 04/07/2014 6:53:48 AM PDT by jameslalor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol

Yes, and was fined a little under $200 bucks for a one-time violation.

However, the federal government was fined over $4 million bucks for violations of his rights and the law.


25 posted on 04/07/2014 7:36:43 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol

If this was from the case from the Fox News Special Report.


26 posted on 04/07/2014 7:37:52 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson