Posted on 04/05/2014 5:18:01 PM PDT by zeestephen
I suspect that the perps are 100% NOT “Peach”.
And therein lies the problem.
It is a "privileged" city, no?
Countdown to Holder and Sharpless to show up in support of the two "yutes", whose fists, I am sure, were unjustly harmed in the incident.
10...9...8...
Back in the 60’s I grew up in Cleveland, Oh and we NEVER went into a black ghetto area...If were found ourselves near the area or God forbid, in the area, we would go through —cautiously—red lights just to get onto a freeway enterance and get out. Cops did not ticket you ..most just looked the other way.
Hopefully the Detroit Cops are trying to separate the Detroit Citizens (and Visitors) into perps and beneficiaries of Police Action.
When is the last a black man hit a white child with a car,and was beaten to a pulp by a crowd of enraged whites?
Driver probably didn’t want to be there either and the little POS dum-ass ran into the street.Driver damed either way, got out to help and the animals attacked,
In the first paragraph? Good Lord, clutching for my heart pills, if this continues, I'm a goner.
I think driving through the ‘hood is worse now than in the 60’s (active rioting periods excluded).
The fact that Chief Craig told people that they’re free to fire at will if they’re threatened has helped a lot. He’s also cut response times to a fraction of what they were.
Well, they say that the victim is white, but they don’t say whether the two teenagers are part of the 80% majority or the 20% minority.
What does the Detroit demographic have to do with it? Are they implying that Utash somehow didn't belong there? Why can't they say that Utash is white and his ATTACKERS were black? Or is that too difficult for MSNBC?
It'd be interesting (and a Good Thing) if the buyer of the Packard Plant could actually turn that site around.
“Detroit is more than 80% black”
Is this a way of trying to get around identifying the perps as black?
Yes that’s it. They don’t want to say that a white driver was attacked by a mob of blacks. So they dance around that subject. They don’t want to make it a racial issue. But at the same time they want to convey that race is a factor.
Let me take a stab at that. I would say, about 476,000 years ago.
The moment I read the original story, I knew it was most likely a hate crime. I found it hard to believe that five to ten unrelated men were so ‘overcome with grief at the little boy’s injuries’ that they would go into a cruel and bloody frenzy. The actual parents, maybe, even though that would also be wrong. The child probably sees adults in that area jaywalking every single day without a care. What surprised me was to read that this man, the beating victim is a Tree Trimmer who does not have any health insurance. I would have thought anyone in such a risky profession would do that, but I guess he though himself to be invincible.
It seems to me that black culture has grown really cruel and violent. Anyone have theories why?
One little step at a time, they're making progress.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.