To: Altenkrug
I would have to side with the muslims here. It is their property to do with what they want.
2 posted on
04/04/2014 12:48:06 PM PDT by
DonaldC
(A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
To: DonaldC
I would have to side with the muslims here. It is their property to do with what they want. I hate to agree, but yeah.
6 posted on
04/04/2014 12:55:20 PM PDT by
MeganC
(Support Matt Bevin to oust Mitch McConnell! https://mattbevin.com/)
To: DonaldC
O.K. You go to Riyadh buy a plot of land and start building a Christian church, a synagogue or a Buddhist pagoda. Ill see what becomes of you...
To: DonaldC
I agree. It’s their mosque. They bought it. It’s not like they stormed the place and slaughtered the Christians like they did at the Hagia Sophia in 1453.
In my town, the moslems bought a building that had been used as a church. The windows of the church were in the shape of the Cross. They stayed about two years, to my amusement, before they were replaced. But after all, it is their building.
32 posted on
04/04/2014 2:14:26 PM PDT by
henkster
(I don't like bossy women telling me what words I can't use.)
To: DonaldC
"I would have to side with the muslims here. It is their property to do with what they want."
I agree, as long as the decision was consistent with applicable laws, rather than based on fear or political correctness, and did not give the Muslims an outcome that others wouldn't have gotten.
To: DonaldC
I don’t see anything about it being designated a “historic landmark”; so I don’t see how anyone could stop them.
35 posted on
04/04/2014 2:46:01 PM PDT by
logic101.net
(How many more children must die on the altar of gun control?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson