Posted on 04/04/2014 8:54:35 AM PDT by Dqban22
Obama EPA’s Monstrous Human Experiments
Posted By Matthew Vadum On April 4, 2014 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage
President Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency has been subjecting unknowing human guinea pigs to high levels of carcinogens and potentially lethal pollutants in order to justify tough new air quality standards.
To make matters worse, EPA has been carrying out these egregiously immoral and unethical human experiments in which subjects are made to inhale freshly pumped-in diesel truck exhaust fumes without advising them of the risk to their health.
Such EPA-funded studies have reportedly been carried out at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, University of Rochester (N.Y.), University of Southern California, University of Michigan, and elsewhere.
It is social engineering of the worst sort carried out by left-wing bureaucrats who view people as objects or playthings, not as individuals. It is also consistent with the profoundly misanthropic ethos of environmentalism, a movement that was already radical 25 years ago but has become outright totalitarian in its goals since it was taken over by neo-Marxists around the world following the collapse of their ideal state, the Soviet Union.
The news, which has largely been ignored by the mainstream media, comes amidst the EPA’s draconian crackdown on wood-burning stoves (that will probably lead to a crackdown on fireplaces too eventually).
The disturbing finding that Americans have been subjected to dangerous toxins for political gain is contained in a new investigative report by The Daily Caller’s Michael Bastasch.
The article comes on the heels of a new report by the EPA’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) that says the EPA’s experiments exposed individuals, including those with asthma and cardiac problems, to pollutants such as diesel fumes in quantities up to 50 times greater than the levels the agency deems safe for humans.
None of the $12-an-hour test subjects has died (yet) but some of them have experienced significant health problems.
After being exposed to “ambient air pollution particles” in 2010, an obese 58-year-old woman with medical problems and a family history of heart disease had to go to the hospital. One volunteer patient was exposed to ozone for 15 minutes and developed a nasty cough while two other experienced “cardiac arrhythmias” during testing.
The dangerous taxpayer-funded experiments were unearthed in 2012 by pseudoscience debunker Steve Milloy. Using the Freedom of Information Act (FoIA), his website, JunkScience.com, got its hands on the results of tests EPA quacks conducted on people who were exposed to high levels of airborne fine particulate matter – soot and dust that scientists refer to PM2.5.
In congressional testimony in late 2011, then-EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson told a congressional committee in effect that her agency was putting at risk the lives of study subjects.
“Particulate matter causes premature death. It doesn’t make you sick. It’s directly causal to dying sooner than you should,” said Jackson who is infamous for using secret pseudonymous email accounts in to conceal her official activities from FoIA inquiries and Congress. EPA claims that PM2.5 can kill those who inhale it within two days of exposure.
“If we could reduce particulate matter to healthy levels it would have the same impact as finding a cure for cancer in our country,” Jackson added.
“Got that?” Milloy wrote. “Airborne dust and soot don’t make you sick, they just kill you – virtually upon exposure.”
So is it true? Is particulate matter dangerous or not?
One manager who oversees the human experiments told the OIG that “the exposure risk for healthy individuals is minimal” and that a person breathing 420 micrograms per cubic meter for two hours “would inhale the same concentration as they would breathing 35 [micrograms per cubic meter]” which happens to be the EPA’s 24-hour regulatory standard for outdoor PM2.5 levels.
The EPA carried out five experiments in 2010 and 2011 to examine the health impact of particulate matter, or PM, and diesel exhaust on people. Although the newly released OIG report found that the EPA did obtain consent forms from 81 people in five studies the “exposure risks were not always consistently represented.”
“Further, the EPA did not include information on long-term cancer risks in its diesel exhaust studies’ consent forms,” the report continued. “An EPA manager considered these long-term risks minimal for short-term study exposures” but “human subjects were not informed of this risk in the consent form.”
Three EPA studies administered high levels of PM to subjects and two of the studies exposed individuals to large quantities of diesel exhaust and ozone.
Although the EPA maintains that particulate matter harms human health, the agency downplays those health risks in the scientific studies it conducts on real, live people. “This lack of warning about PM is also different from the EPA’s public image about PM,” said the Inspector General’s report...
The rest of the history
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/obama-epas-monstrous-human-experiments/print/
On the lighter brighter side the little liberal sh*ts would never hurt a frog.
The Nazi’s had nothing on these goons.
Are they seeking to use these on a larger scale in the FEMA internment camps?
The inclusion of unknowing “volunteers” in some sort of experiment is an old and widespread practice among the various despotic and tyrannical governments over the span of history, and probably for most of pre-history as well.
Back in the late 1940’s, while there were atomic bombs still being tested in the atmosphere, the radioactive drift was measured by the civilian collateral damage that was detected. So even the relatively free and open government of what was then known as the “United States of America” was a participant in this sort of expropriating the services of US citizens as laboratory rats, without their knowledge, consent, and for the most part, only very belated compensation, if any.
Seems like an attempted murder charge is in order.
I never realized Eduard Wirths was in the Obama administration.
So water boarding a terrorist for information to save Americans is evil. But actual physical harm to Americans to advance leftist green agenda is good.
Woe to those who call good evil and evil good.
“Dr. Mengele, paging Dr. Mengele...you’re wanted on the Presidential Red Line. Paging Dr. Mengele.”
(Excerpted from his book:) Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust
For what developments would a comprehensive explanation of the Holocaust have to account? For the extermination of the Jews to occur, four principal things were necessary:
1. The Nazis - that is, the leadership, specifically Hitler - had to decide to undertake the extermination.
2. They had to gain control over the Jews, namely over the territory in which they resided.
3. They had to organize the extermination and devote to it sufficient resources.
4. They had to induce a large number of people to carry out the killings.
The Lobotomy Files:Forgotten Soldiers(Part 1)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3108264/posts
The U.S. government lobotomized roughly 2,000 mentally ill veterans—and likely hundreds more—during and after World War II, according to a cache of forgotten memos, letters and government reports unearthed by The Wall Street Journal.
If these experiments are so safe, why not save money and run these tests on EPA employees? It would probably be the only real benefit the country will get from that lot.
democrats=islamists
I always thought it was Nixon’s EPA?
rhetorical, I know...but I had to
Just like the goose steppers of old. Amazing we hear nothing from the RINOs. Only the begining.
Why were they using a subject that was already badly compromised? To see if it would kill her outright?
In the early days of WW2 the Nazis packed rooms full of concentration camp “criminals” and pumped Diesel exhaust from running trucks into the rooms. Diesel exhaust does not have sufficient CO to kill quickly so that method of extermination was suspended.
This lead to the use of Zyklon B. What’s next on the EPA’s agenda?
Any pubbie legislator’s out there with enough spine to take this on? Doubt it.
“The road to hell is paved with good intentions”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.