Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nifster
Yup. It's also important to note what's "prohibited". This isn't a tattoo of "Mom" and a heart, or maybe your kid's name on your upper arm.

It's tats above the neck and past the wrists - which, though my knowledge is *very* old, used to be illegal to perform in at least several states. (Tattoos on the genitalia are also illegal, but that's not germaine to this particular discussion. :-) )

IMO, and I'm just talking here, I'd guess that mostly it's to disqualify people with gang tattoos. That's just a shot in the dark, but I don't think it's a stretch.

33 posted on 04/03/2014 10:18:13 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: wbill

I agree with your assessment.


85 posted on 04/03/2014 2:27:00 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson