This is not a matter of refusing orders they do not like. This is existential level stuff with national security implications as we see with the little homo now serving time in Leavenworth over his little fabulous fit and demanding a sex change. It’s about a military with record levels of man on man sex assault.
This is way beyond not wanting to go police a flight line or some common gripe.
I think it’s best for their to BE be gay officers. Yes Obama is the problem. But as long as he meets zero resistance he will only grab more power and destroy more of what we love. That only stops when we start resisting it.
The founders put more than careers out there. They put their lives. Some died for their beliefs. Kinda makes the sacrifice a bit more telling that some people today are more concerned about their retirement than even SPEAKING OUT against this insanity doesn’t it?.
ARGH!!! NOT TO BE GAY OFFICERS!!!
Talk about a typo...
Sure its best for there NOT to be gay officers or gay enlisted. Absolutely, 100% the best solution.
I know nothing about these Admirals but have to assume they are fairly competent to have reached that level. If they resigned over something like this they would be REPLACED by a pro-gay officer. Someone who probably WILL support bam bams other agenda items.
Meanwhile their subordinates cannot resign.
Seems like I recall study recently (and briefly) in the news that under close scrutiny pointed to significant higher levels of same-sex sexual assault in the military. Can anyone jog the memory?