Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dilbert San Diego
"Just wondering why global warming is necessarily, by definition, a negative event per the liberals."

I've been asking that question for years. It seems that warming would have BOTH positive and negative effects, but libs insists it would be 110% negative and catastrophic.

I have also been asking if they would prefer global cooling, and what the effects of global cooling would be.
29 posted on 04/02/2014 10:23:23 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle

Actually, generally studies suggest that a warmer planet is a wetter planet. Water plus CO2 is great for plant growth, and for the animals that follow.


67 posted on 04/02/2014 12:47:27 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson