[Valpal1]

We simply want the good guys to have a chance at a future without Government interference and grow their own food as they see fit.

The above statement conflicts with your desire for additional regulation through more labeling requirements.

If you indeed want less interference with farmers then you would let farmers decide whether they want to be CAFO or not. The fact is, the EPA definitions allow it to designate any livestock producer they want as a CAFO, irrespective of reality or reason.

[acapesket]

hey Val! I didn’t say “d*ck” about the EPA and yes indeedie do believe that people have a right to know what they are buying to put in their bodies. If you choose to be CAFO and you think it’s so wonderful then declare it proudly.
Why is it so hard to understand that people would like to know that they are eating non GMO.
If you are so opposed and so convinced that CAFO is better then why stop the organic Farmers from declaring that theirs are not?

How about just labeling non GMO and then we won’t buy CAFO?

HMMM