You keep on taking me out of context then calling it lies. What use is there with reasoning with you? You keep on smearing, smearing, smearing, taking what I say in the way that you wish I had said it so you have something more to smear.
You have a problem with swallowing camels and straining out gnats. A government as small and accountable as what the Founders envisioned wouldn’t have ever dared to think it could innovate a new kind of “marriage.” You think you can hold a gargantuan government accountable? It is to laugh.
I didn’t take your deliberately dishonest claims about Paul and DOMA out of context, you were lying, to propagandize a pro-gay marriage libertarian position and candidate.
You are also misleading freepers on marriage at the federal level, the federal level of gay marriage in the military, federal employment and immigration fits completely with Rand Paul’s gay marriage position and is something he obviously supports as he promotes your position on the GOP to be changed to accepting gay marriage.
The founders DID recognize Massachusetts, New York, etc., marriage law, at the federal level.
You are absolutely correct, I’d just shrug my shoulders to someone who must not understand the Constitution well and probably has no concept of Federalism, let alone questioning one’s own reading comprehension. I’m not a Paul fan, he’d be a ways down on candidates I’d vote for but in fairness, we should not be misstating or fabricating views of possible candidates, whomever it is. That is a reflection on those who misstate the issues.