Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wetphoenix
Indeed, they are an explosion hazards in case of any minor fuel leak. I wouldn’t ever used one on high seas because of storms, waves etc. Another thing is a price issue. LNG is not cheap at all and for that reason is not ever competitive with pipeline delivered gas in Europe. It can’t beat oil as a boat fuel in that department as well. Sounds like another green blunder.

Welcome to FR and spend some time reading basic engineering before posting. Having an opinion devoid of reality is the realm of liberalism.

I have a homework assignment for you. All the information is available with google. Why is a standard automobile fuel tank more dangerous than LNG?

There is really nothing you posted that has any truth to it, but I will endeavour to direct you in the right direction. Do you have a clue of what Gazprom charges per therm?
31 posted on 03/31/2014 3:35:02 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: PA Engineer; thackney; Timocrat

Thank you for a hint guys. I did some research and it seems like you are right and my earlier opinion was based on biased interview.


33 posted on 04/01/2014 9:53:27 PM PDT by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson