Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RayChuang88
I'll believe the battery thing when it happens. Liquid fuels are excellent for storing large amounts of energy. Batteries can do that, but they tend to be even touchier than the liquid fuels.

But your reactor could power the process described, or other processes for converting natural gas to liquid fuel. For the trains, and lots of other things, electricity is great, if it's cheap enough. But "go where you want to go, when you want to go there" mobile power is probably not one of them, except in hybrid power trains which take much less battery capacity.

19 posted on 04/06/2014 5:22:05 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
Once we start to commercially scale up the liquid fluoride thorium reactor, we could generate such a gigantic excess amount of electricity that suddenly, things that require a huge amount of electricity such as electrifying our rail lines, large scale seawater desalinization, and large-scale implementation of electric car chargers become economically viable. After all, at the beginning of the 20th Century our petroleum infrastructure was primarily for the distribution of kerosene for lamp fuel, but technological developments within 20 years made it possible to distribute gasoline for the fast-growing fleet of automobiles by 1920.
22 posted on 04/06/2014 7:31:28 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson