Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tenacious 1

He needs to sue the state for not taking better care of its dependents.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Interesting line.
If you own a car and your 35 yo son lives with you are you not required to name him on the insurance policy ‘just in case’ he should drive your car?

“WE” are responsible for our dependents, and if we ‘house’ them we have to take some kind of responsibility for their actions.

Kind of along the line of since I need a DRUG TEST to be able to work to pay taxes to eventually go to the ‘public sector’, shouldn’t ‘they’ be required to undergo drug tests to receive ‘OUR’ money????


30 posted on 03/31/2014 6:53:32 AM PDT by xrmusn ((6/98 --"I would agree with you BUT that would make both of us wrong".))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: xrmusn
He needs to sue the state for not taking better care of its dependents.

....“WE” are responsible for our dependents, and if we ‘house’ them we have to take some kind of responsibility for their actions.

I assume you realize that my line was cynical and sarcastic. Of course I agree with you.

79 posted on 03/31/2014 8:23:54 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (My whimsical litany of satyric prose and avarice pontification of wisdom demonstrates my concinnity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson