Not unless they are using “conservative” in the sense that, as the Soviet Union was dissolving, the hard-core Stalinists in the Kremlim were suddenly the “conservatives.”
could be, but nevertheless, to both Republican-elitists or Democrat-statists the term “conservative” is a perjorative.
It frustrates me to no end that NO ONE SEEMS TO READ ANYMORE.
The article said “big gop donors”.
The article never had the word “conservative” in it anywhere.
The gist of the article is that the GOP wants a winner and Bush is the strongest candidate so far.
If you want to name a stronger candidate, the lets hear it and the gop donors will likely get behind a stronger candidate.
If you can’t name a stronger candidate (Tom Tancredo and Newt Gingrich won’t cut it) then you need to shut up your bellyaching. Oh and Palin’s resume to be potus is that she was AK governor for 2 years 7 months and mayor of Wasilla (population 5,000).
Like it or not, your realistic choices are likely to be Santorum, Bush, Romney, or Ryan.
Cruz should run and Cruz should lose due to a thin resume and inexperience in running a national campaign. The way to get experience in a national campaign is to run in 2016 , finish a close 2nd or third, and then he will be ready in 2020.