Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vermont Lt

If Gold was going to boom, do you think they would be shilling it all of the time? Or would those Gold companies hold onto their gold and sell it later?


Those who are selling essentially don’t own any gold, any more than minimal inventory. They’re RETAILERS who profit from the transaction.

Or do you think that realtors are hypocrites for trying to sell houses when they should be holding on to them?

I’m amazed that intelligent Freepers come up with this argument so often.


24 posted on 03/28/2014 9:36:01 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("Income Inequality?" Let's start with Washington DC vs. the rest of the nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Atlas Sneezed
I’m amazed that intelligent Freepers come up with this argument so often.

I see a false assumption on your part.

My favorite "intelligent" argument is the one that sees no possible variation in collapse scenarios. It's either status quo or The Road: The "you can't eat gold argument".

31 posted on 03/28/2014 9:57:47 AM PDT by Stentor (Maybe the Goldman Sachs thing is just a coincidence. /S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson