Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grobdriver

They want exemption from DUI laws. Pot stays in their bloodstream but is “inactive”, don’t you know? Besides stoners only “drive too slow” they claim.

Never mind that the deadly accidents aren’t from 0.08 drunk drivers (being pushed downward to 0.03 and it’s 0.01 in Sweden).

Since the standard for alcohol use is headed towards “any measurable amount in your blood”, why not go ahead and keep pot at that threshold? They were fine with demonizing alcohol and tobacco.


26 posted on 03/26/2014 10:27:58 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise
Since the standard for alcohol use is headed towards “any measurable amount in your blood”, why not go ahead and keep pot at that threshold? They were fine with demonizing alcohol and tobacco.

Not sure who this disembodied "they" are, I have yet to see anyone on the anti alcohol and anti tobacco bandwagon who isn't real big in the anti legal weed bandwagon, too. I know it's a wacky idea totally devoid of the required hypocrisy and desire force others to live the way you want them to live, but if you want to stop the anti alcohol and anti tobacco nazis, you may find allies in the pro legal weed crowd.

105 posted on 03/26/2014 12:13:23 PM PDT by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson