What are you on about?
Are you suggesting that Hobby Lobby wants to prevent their employers from using their salaries as they see fit?
Cause that isn't the argument being made here.
If I buy a bottle of whiskey with my paycheck, that is not the same as my employer buying me a bottle of whiskey.
She said Hobby Lobby can pay a select few more money. Either way, Hobby Lobby is paying for it.
I believe Roberts will write the majority oppinion. He’ll quote the Bible about obeying the laws of the land.
Per your whiskey example, it’s the same thing if your employer pays you more than the non drinkers so you can buy the whiskey.