Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VerySadAmerican
Still, Kagan thinks Hobby Lobby paying a “Fluke” more pay so she can buy the morning after pill isn’t the same as Hobby Lobby outright paying for it.

What are you on about?

Are you suggesting that Hobby Lobby wants to prevent their employers from using their salaries as they see fit?

Cause that isn't the argument being made here.

If I buy a bottle of whiskey with my paycheck, that is not the same as my employer buying me a bottle of whiskey.

72 posted on 03/25/2014 1:24:44 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave

She said Hobby Lobby can pay a select few more money. Either way, Hobby Lobby is paying for it.

I believe Roberts will write the majority oppinion. He’ll quote the Bible about obeying the laws of the land.


103 posted on 03/25/2014 2:25:23 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: SoothingDave

Per your whiskey example, it’s the same thing if your employer pays you more than the non drinkers so you can buy the whiskey.


104 posted on 03/25/2014 2:26:57 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson