There have always been liberals on the Court but Kagan continues to plumb new depths of embarrassment with her obvious premise of government first, last and always. She is beyond artless in her questioning.
She’s as qualified to be on the Court as I am to run the Olympic 100m.
By that measure, as long as you have traveled, by foot, for more than 100m in your lifetime, your are supremely more qualified than she. The real question is, what is your race, sex, religion and sexual orientation? Apparently these are important too.
I dunno, I'd argue that you and I are *more* qualified to run the 100, in that I can run 100m. Not very fast, but I can do it. :-)
If Kagan was a sprinter instead of a lawyer, she'd never get out of the blocks, and would spend her time arguing about gun control for the starter, and if the finish line needs to be moved closer to her.
I would challenge you to a race, but the last time I ram a 100m race, I missed Christmas...