Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mdmathis6

“They recanted for the US side...not the rest of the world side.”

No way. This is true? Dang.


136 posted on 03/28/2014 9:53:17 AM PDT by garjog (Obama: making the world safe for Sharia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: garjog

Look very carefully at there recantation press releases...states disingenuously....”the policy has been reversed for the U.S. side.” they did not recant for the organization as a whole. Since WV executives travel from other parts of the world and back again on various assignments, some of them possibly bringing their same sex spouses with them, the recantation is meaningless.


137 posted on 03/28/2014 1:15:37 PM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: garjog

“Today’s letter explaining the reversal (posted in full below) was approved by the entire board, Stearns said. [Editor’s note: All references to “World Vision” refer to its U.S. branch only, not its international umbrella organization.]”

From CT magazine


138 posted on 03/28/2014 1:23:26 PM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson