If the story said nowhere that they are black, then the default assumption would be based on inner city violence statistics, which uniformly indicate a probability of blacks involved in any particular act of criminal violence.
Therefore as those are the actually "facts" of this matter, it seems a little racist ofr you to be saying that to ignore these facts is a little racist. Which would make you a race-baiter.
To: MNDude
many of the people on DailyMail are implying that the attackers are black. I see nowhere from the story that indicates that. Seems a little racist to just assume something like that until all the facts come in.
If the story said nowhere that they are black, then the default assumption would be based on inner city violence statistics, which uniformly indicate a probability of blacks involved in any particular act of criminal violence.
“Therefore as those are the actually “facts” of this matter, it seems a little racist ofr you to be saying that to ignore these facts is a little racist. Which would make you a race-baiter.
46 posted on Mon Mar 24 2014 19:25:15 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies | Report Abuse]”
Advantage: Talisker