To: Bon of Babble
Anyone care to hazard a guess on a more detailed description of the gang members?
11 posted on
03/24/2014 4:06:23 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: SandRat
Probably White and Asian males...wearing WWJD t-shirts?
17 posted on
03/24/2014 4:13:38 PM PDT by
EEGator
To: SandRat
Anyone care to hazard a guess on a more detailed description of the gang members?
When it comes to urban violence, I think we all can figure out what "youth", "teens", "juveniles" and "mob" are really euphemisms for.
I actually think it's time we went Alinsky on it, make the Progs OWN their own terminology.
To: SandRat
"Anyone care to hazard a guess on a more detailed description of the gang members?"
Since this information is specifically left out, you can infer TWO things:
This was NOT a gang of white children that hit a white woman.
This was NOT a gang of white kids hitting a black person.
The latter would be national news.
Since it's not national news, use your imagination.
And it's the furthest thing from "racism" to guess what happened.
24 posted on
03/24/2014 4:17:13 PM PDT by
boop
(I just wanted a President. But I got a rock.)
To: SandRat
"Anyone care to hazard a guess on a more detailed description of the gang members?"From the detailed description by the fifth-column MSM, it sounds like the gang might be Amish Eskimos. Just a guess, though.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson