[Steve_Seattle]

"However, as argued in Slate by UCLA Constitutional Law Professor Adam Winkler, “The owners claim that their personal religious beliefs would be offended if they have to provide certain forms of birth control coverage to employees. Yet Hobby Lobby’s owners aren’t required by the law to do anything... If Hobby Lobby fails to provide the required insurance, the company, not the owners, is responsible.”

[RichInOC]

It’s privately held, so that’s a distinction without a difference.