We are not talking about Obama or his school czar. No one is asking or expecting you or me to vote for Obama or his pedophile school czar.
We're talking about voting FOR an agent who advocates contact between children and homosexuals. You are asking me to vote FOR that.
To make matters worse, you pretend that voting FOR that is somehow voting "against" a pedophile school czar. Where is the devil in all of this, Gen. Blather? Is the devil the thing in your brain that is rationalizing that it's okay to vote for depravity in the name of voting "against" it?
And when I refuse, when I make the obvious point that voting FOR that endangers souls, you accuse me of being a "purist."
Just wow.
On the national scene the thing that matters is, will this president have a higher or lower probability of getting this or the next generation of Americans incinerated by nuclear devices?
Obama has actively encouraged the blackmailer state of Iran to develop nuclear weapons. As a result Obama started a nuclear arms race in the middle east. Eventually we’ll suffer for that.
Actually, I’m totally unaware of the Romney/homosexual connection and I am fairly well read. Your post is the first every thing I’ve heard about it. I’m not saying its not there, but if it is how much safer will the children be if they have to wear environmental suits to school because it’s high rad day?