Gen. Blather, it is a FACT that Romney has consistently advocated and advanced contact between homosexuals and children, from his days as Massachusetts governor and his support of Gay Youth Pride "outreach" to middle-schoolers, to shortly before Nov 2012 when he stated that he believed two homosexuals who, I quote, "love each other" should be able to adopt children. That MEANS that Romney believes it is government's job to PUNISH adoption agencies that tell prospective homosexual "parents" to take a hike.
It is a FACT that Romney stated with crystal clarity that he believes that a minor girl who is pregnant, and whose parents refuse to give their consent for her to have an abortion, has a right to go to a judge and have that judge overrule her parents.
Jesus had very harsh words for those who would "lead little ones astray." WHAT WOULD YOU CALL ROMNEY?
When good Christians take action and vote FOR an agent of that kind of child-focused depravity, how does that action not endanger their souls, let alone the soul of America?
“I DO believe he would have damaged America souls on the ETERNAL scene. “
Obama’s “safe school’s” czar is a self admitted pedophile. There were no good candidates. I had to think about which one might prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear blackmailer. Which one might give us the lowest casualty numbers in Afghanistan? Which one was more likely to prevent the collapse of the few “friendly” regimes in the middle east? Which one would do the least damage to our allies? Yes, I held my nose and took the least bad choice. I took the choice I thought would give the best outcome four or eight years later. A Mitt Romney might have given us a decent VP who might have reversed some of the damage.
You have to play the cards as they’re dealt. You can’t throw them away and announce you’re not playing without losing everything.