As opposed to voting FOR someone who was a leftist tyrant? Because that is what you DID vote for, though he wasn't Muslim and wasn't Marxist.
In other words, Kit Cat, Ann Archer, and all the rest of you who insist that those of us who refused to vote for Romney were "purists" even though most of us would have voted for Gingrich when we disagree with him profoundly on many issues ... hmmm .. how is that purist???? .... but ...
... in other words, you voted without a single solitary reflection as to what you were voting FOR.
How do you vote "against"?
By voting FOR something else.
So -- when you voted for Romney, I know you were voting "against" Obama. WHAT WERE YOU VOTING FOR?
I voted third party and I know exactly what I was voting for. Do ANY OF YOU know what you were voting for? Did any of you who so stupidly and defensively and deceitfully insult me and others as being "purists," did any of you even give any thought as to what you were voting FOR?
Or were you so blindly panicked and fearful that you failed completely to consider what you were voting FOR?
Barak Obama IS destroying our military, our businesses, our healthcare
system, giving the Internet to GOD knows who, uses the IRS against his
enemies, uses the NSA to spy on his foes, has DESTROYED our justice
department, is purging military officers in droves, EPA OUT OF CONTROL, dictating labor regulations and laws(can’t remember name of his labor board) I am a die hard conservative but would I have voted for
Hillary over this Marxist YOU BET I WOULD HAVE! This MARXISTS goal
has ALWAYS been to TRANSFORM America and you can bet I WOULD take BILL CLINTON or HILLARY CLINTON back in a heartbeat!! yes Ron
Paul is a wackadoodle but he is NOT A MARXIST!!!