Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lou Budvis
No, it’s a call to adhere to a strict interpretation of the Constitution which reserves these issues to the States as the Constitution does not address them.

Which state is it that dictates gay marriage in the military and federal employment and immigration, and abortion for federal military, and gays in the United States military?

18 posted on 03/24/2014 11:52:39 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

Gays in the military is over as an issue. There have been gays in the US military since Von Steuben and there always will be. Maybe there has been some evidence about gays in the military being a actual detriment, but I don’t know of it. I think it’s even harder to make the argument against gays being employed by the federal gov’t. Even Ronald Reagan opposed a measure which would have barred gays from working in California schools. How many people are affected by gays in immigration policy? My guess it that the number is very small in comparison to the negative attention that opposing it would produce.


19 posted on 03/24/2014 12:08:27 PM PDT by Lou Budvis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson